(Prefer videos? Watch a summary of this article below.)

Ask five .NET developers to compare Umbraco and Sitecore, and you’ll get five different answers depending on which project shaped them most. That’s because the Umbraco vs Sitecore decision isn’t really about which CMS is “better” — it’s about which one matches the size, budget, and ambition of what you’re building. A five-person marketing team launching a corporate website and a 400-person enterprise running personalized commerce across twelve markets have almost nothing in common operationally. Yet both get pointed at the same two platforms because both happen to run on .NET.

This guide breaks down the Sitecore vs Umbraco question from the angle that actually matters to a business owner or IT director: not feature checklists, but fit. We’ll walk through what each platform is, where they genuinely overlap, where the Umbraco and Sitecore difference becomes a real constraint or a real advantage, and which one to choose depending on whether you’re running ecommerce, B2B lead generation, an enterprise portfolio of sites, or a marketing-led content operation. 

If you’re weighing a migration between the two, we’ve also covered the scenarios and risks worth planning for before you commit.

What Is Umbraco?

Umbraco is an open-source content management system built on ASP.NET and .NET Core, first released in 2005 by Danish developer Niels Hartvig. It’s licensed under MIT, which means the core CMS — Umbraco CMS, sometimes called “Umbraco Community” — is free to download, self-host, and modify. Around that free core, Umbraco HQ sells commercial add-ons: Umbraco Cloud for managed hosting and deployment pipelines, Umbraco Commerce for online stores, Umbraco Forms, and Umbraco Workflow for approval processes.

The philosophy is developer-first and editor-friendly. Content structuring uses “Document Types” that a developer defines once, after which editors work inside a clean, tree-based backoffice without touching code. Because it’s a .NET application, it plugs neatly into existing Microsoft environments — Azure, SQL Server, Active Directory — and any C# developer can pick it up without learning a proprietary framework from scratch. 

Umbraco also ships with a genuinely open architecture: no forced hosting provider, no licensing meter counting page views, and community packages covering everything from SEO tooling to headless delivery via its Content Delivery API.

What Is Sitecore?

Sitecore is a commercial digital experience platform (DXP) headquartered in the US, built on the .NET stack and first launched in 2001. Where Umbraco is a CMS with modules bolted around it, Sitecore is architected the other way: a suite — Sitecore XM Cloud or XP for content management, Sitecore CDP for customer data, Sitecore Personalize for real-time experience targeting, Sitecore Send for email, and Sitecore OrderCloud for commerce — sold as an integrated, licensed whole.

That breadth is the point. Sitecore targets organizations that need to unify content, customer data, and personalization logic across dozens of sites, brands, or regions, then act on that data without stitching together five separate vendors. The trade-off is complexity and cost: implementing Sitecore properly usually means a specialized systems integrator, a multi-month rollout, and an annual license fee that scales with traffic, sessions, or contact volume, plus infrastructure hosted on Sitecore’s cloud or your own Azure tenancy. 

Editors get a rich, marketing-oriented interface with built-in A/B testing and behavioral personalization; developers work inside a more opinionated, layered architecture that rewards experience with Sitecore-specific patterns like the Helix framework.

Umbraco vs Sitecore: Core Similarities

Before the differences, it’s worth noting the common ground that puts both platforms on the same shortlist.

Microsoft .NET ecosystem

Both platforms live inside the Microsoft world, which is the single biggest reason enterprises with a .NET investment default to comparing these two rather than pulling in a PHP or Node-based CMS. Your existing C# developers, Azure DevOps pipelines, and Active Directory identity setup transfer with minimal friction. It also means both platforms benefit — and occasionally suffer — from the same .NET release cadence, IIS quirks, and SQL Server dependency patterns.

Custom website development

Neither is a drag-and-drop SaaS builder in the Wix sense. Both expect a developer to define the content architecture, templates, and integrations before an editor ever touches the backoffice. That’s a deliberate trade: less out-of-the-box speed than a no-code tool, but far more control over performance, data structure, and how the site behaves at scale.

Content management for marketing teams

Once the developer groundwork is done, both platforms give marketing teams a genuinely usable editing experience — structured fields instead of raw HTML, content previews, versioning, and scheduled publishing. On either platform, marketing teams can update copy, swap images, and launch landing pages without opening a ticket with IT for routine changes.

Multilingual and multisite projects

Running a UK site, a German site, and a US site from one installation is standard practice on both. Umbraco handles this through language variants tied to content nodes; Sitecore does it through its site and language configuration layered across its content tree. Both avoid the common CMS trap of needing a separate installation per market.

Third-party integrations

CRM systems, marketing automation platforms, payment gateways, analytics suites — both platforms are built to connect outward rather than trap you inside a closed system. Umbraco leans on its open package ecosystem and standard .NET connectors; Sitecore leans on its partner marketplace and a longer history of enterprise integration patterns with tools like Salesforce and Dynamics.

Scalable digital experiences

Given the right architecture and hosting, both platforms can serve high-traffic, multi-region deployments. Umbraco does this through horizontal scaling on Azure App Service or Kubernetes; Sitecore does it through its own cloud infrastructure and content delivery layer, typically with a bigger budget attached to reach the same throughput.

Umbraco vs Sitecore: Key Differences

This is where the differences between Umbraco and Sitecore shape a buying decision.

Platform type and market positioning

Umbraco positions itself as a flexible, developer-friendly CMS — content management first, with everything else added as needed. Sitecore positions itself as a full DXP where content is just one module among customer data, personalization, and commerce. That single distinction cascades into almost every other row above: Sitecore charges and architects for the whole suite whether you use all of it or not, while Umbraco lets you pay only for what you add.

Technology stack and development approach

Umbraco feels close to plain ASP.NET MVC — Razor views, standard controllers. Sitecore adds more layers — rendering variants, item-based modeling, JSS/Next.js for headless — and its developers are scarcer and pricier to hire.

Content editing experience

Umbraco’s backoffice is famously clean — a left-hand content tree, a properties panel, and not much else to learn. Sitecore’s Experience Editor is more visual, letting marketers click directly on a live page to edit components. But that visual layer adds configuration overhead for developers and a steeper learning curve for new editors.

Scalability and performance

Umbraco scales like any well-built .NET app: load balancing, caching, a properly sized database. Sitecore’s role-based architecture (separate Content Management, Delivery, and Processing instances) handles enterprise traffic well but needs more DevOps investment upfront.

Personalization and marketing automation

This is Sitecore’s headline differentiator. Sitecore Personalize can trigger real-time content changes based on visitor behavior, segment, or predictive scoring, all inside the platform. Umbraco’s native personalization is comparatively basic — audience targeting through content variants — though third-party tools can close much of the gap for teams that don’t need Sitecore’s full behavioral engine.

Analytics and reporting

Sitecore tracks journeys and conversions in native dashboards. Umbraco assumes you’ll bring GA4 or a BI tool, keeping the CMS lighter but analytics external.

SEO capabilities

Both support clean URLs, structured data, and caching. Umbraco’s lighter markup often loads faster by default; Sitecore can match it but needs deliberate architecture to avoid overhead.

Ecommerce functionality

Umbraco Commerce suits mid-sized stores well. OrderCloud is a dedicated, API-first engine for complex B2B/B2C catalogs at enterprise scale and cost.

Third-party integrations

Umbraco leans on a free, active package community. Sitecore leans on certified partner connectors and its own suite — powerful inside its ecosystem, less flexible outside it.

Security and compliance

Both support RBAC, SSO, and encryption. Sitecore’s licensing typically bundles more formal compliance documentation and SLAs; Umbraco compliance work falls more on the implementation partner.

Multilingual and multisite management

Umbraco manages languages at the content-node level, so you need to plan for them as they scale. Sitecore’s multi-tenant architecture is purpose-built for many sites and languages, but it requires a heavier setup cost.

Hosting, cloud, and deployment options

Umbraco offers real choice: self-host, any Azure tier, or Umbraco Cloud. Sitecore increasingly pushes toward its own managed XM Cloud, simplifying ops but increasing lock-in.

Pricing and total cost of ownership

Umbraco’s free core keeps realistic cost in the low tens of thousands annually for mid-sized projects. Sitecore licensing alone often starts in the five figures and climbs to the six figures for enterprise contracts before implementation. This gap is usually the first filter in any Sitecore vs Umbraco decision.

What Are the Pros and Cons of Umbraco?

Umbraco combines flexibility and lower costs with fewer built-in enterprise features. The table below summarizes its main advantages and limitations.

What Are the Pros and Cons of Sitecore?

Sitecore offers powerful enterprise capabilities but requires higher complexity and investment. The table below highlights its key pros and cons.

Umbraco vs Sitecore for Ecommerce

Both platforms can support ecommerce projects, but they target different levels of complexity and business needs. The comparison below shows the main differences. 

Umbraco vs Sitecore for B2B Companies

Umbraco and Sitecore both support B2B websites, but their strengths differ depending on marketing, integration, and scalability requirements.

Umbraco vs Sitecore for Enterprise Websites

Enterprise organizations need strong governance, scalability, and integration capabilities. The table below compares how each platform approaches these needs. 

Umbraco vs Sitecore for Marketing Teams

Marketing teams will experience different workflows depending on whether they prioritize simplicity or advanced personalization features. 

When to Choose Umbraco

Umbraco fits when you need a fast, affordable, well-governed content platform rather than an all-in-one marketing suite: corporate sites, agency builds, B2B lead-gen, and mid-sized ecommerce where you’d rather integrate best-of-breed tools than pay for a bundle you’ll only partly use. It also suits organizations without a dedicated marketing operations team.

When to Choose Sitecore

Sitecore earns its price when personalization, unified customer data, and multi-brand governance are non-negotiable, not nice-to-haves. Large enterprises with global campaigns, regulated organizations needing formal compliance, and teams with a dedicated MarTech function get the most value. If your team would use ten percent of the feature set, the license is hard to justify.

Migration Between Umbraco and Sitecore

Migration runs both directions: some companies move to Sitecore as personalization needs grow; others move to Umbraco when licensing outpaces the value they extract.

Common migration scenarios

• Umbraco to Sitecore: growth into personalization-heavy marketing across an expanding site portfolio.
• Sitecore to Umbraco: right-sizing after paying enterprise licensing for standard-site functionality.
• Legacy CMS to either: leaving outdated systems for whichever platform matches the new scale.
• On-premises to cloud: moving to Umbraco Cloud or Sitecore XM Cloud without switching platforms.

Risks to consider before migration

Content modeling rarely maps one-to-one between platforms, so plan for remapping content types and templates rather than a straight lift-and-shift. URL structures need careful redirect planning to protect SEO equity built up over years. Custom integrations — CRM sync, payment gateways, marketing automation — typically need to be rebuilt, not just reconnected. 

And budget for a parallel-run period: cutting over a live, revenue-generating site without a staged rollback plan is the single most common cause of migration incidents.

Why Choose SaM Solutions for Umbraco and Sitecore Development?

SaM Solutions works across both platforms rather than pushing clients toward whichever one we specialize in, so we recommend based on your project, not our bench allocation. 

Our .NET teams have delivered custom Umbraco builds for mid-market and B2B clients who needed speed and cost control, alongside Sitecore implementations for enterprises that needed the full DXP feature set — including migrations in both directions when a client’s needs outgrew their original platform choice.

That means an honest cost-versus-capability assessment before we write a line of code, and support through launch, scaling, and beyond.

Final Comparison: Which CMS Should You Choose?

Strip away the vendor language, and the decision comes down to three questions: 

• Do you need built-in personalization and unified analytics badly enough to pay enterprise licensing, or would a lighter CMS plus targeted integrations get you there for less? 
• How many sites, brands, and languages are you actually governing today, and realistically, in three years? 
• And what’s your team’s appetite and budget for a longer, integrator-led build versus a faster, developer-led one?

Answer those honestly, and the Umbraco vs Sitecore choice tends to make itself. Umbraco usually serves mid-market businesses and B2B companies with moderate personalization needs better because it costs less and is faster to launch. Large, multi-brand enterprises with dedicated marketing operations are usually better served by Sitecore’s bundled capability, despite the price, since the alternative is assembling the same capability from separate vendors.

(Prefer videos? Watch a summary of this article below.)

Sitecore XP 10.5 is a long-term platform release focused on security, reliability, compatibility, and easier modernization rather than a large set of new marketing features. For organizations that intend to keep using Sitecore’s deployable Platform DXP, it offers a more sustainable foundation for the years ahead.

The release became generally available on August 5, 2026. In a recent webinar, Principal Product Manager Colin te Kempel explained how Sitecore plans to innovate without forcing customers to abandon mature websites, integrations, and content operations.

This makes 10.5 more than a maintenance update. It also signals how Sitecore expects Platform DXP to develop alongside its newer cloud and AI products.

A Brief History of Sitecore XP Updates

Sitecore XP 10.x has evolved from deployment and developer improvements toward stronger security, API-based integration, and gradual modernization. Version 10.5 consolidates that work and prepares the platform for a more modular release model.

Sitecore also delivered hotfixes, security updates, modules, and smaller platform releases between 10.4 and 10.5. For customers, this points to a future in which improvements arrive more frequently instead of being held for occasional major upgrades.

What’s New in Sitecore XP 10.5?

Sitecore XP 10.5 updates the supported infrastructure, improves security and reliability, and refreshes the authoring interface. The most important upgrade requirement is the move to Solr 10, which makes 10.5 a planned project rather than a routine patch.

The release notes list many smaller fixes. From a management perspective, their combined value matters more than any individual change: fewer outdated dependencies, better security defaults, and a platform designed to remain supportable longer.

There are still upgrade risks. Changes to search, security behavior, monitoring, deployment tools, and custom extensions can affect existing solutions. Technical teams should map official breaking changes to the current implementation and confirm module compatibility before setting the project schedule.

Should I Upgrade My Sitecore XP to 10.5?

You should seriously consider upgrading if Sitecore XP will remain a strategic platform for the next several years or if your current version is approaching the end of support. Organizations running a stable XP 10.4 environment have more flexibility, but they should still include 10.5 in their medium-term roadmap.

The support lifecycle is a strong reason to act. XP 10.5 has mainstream support through December 31, 2029, extended support through 2032, and sustaining support through 2034; extended support for XP 10.0 and 10.1 ends on December 31, 2026.

Before approving the investment, decision-makers should ask five questions:

1. How long will the organization continue using Platform DXP?
2. Which parts of the infrastructure must be upgraded at the same time?
3. Are all business-critical modules and integrations compatible?
4. How much custom code and technical debt will need remediation?
5. What level of testing, downtime, and rollback protection does the business require?

The assessment should produce a clear scope, budget, schedule, and risk profile. A generic recommendation to “stay current” is not enough for a complex enterprise estate.

What’s the Future of Sitecore XP?

Sitecore plans to keep investing in Platform DXP while modernizing it in stages rather than replacing it with one disruptive release. Existing websites and business processes can remain in place as customers adopt new editing, delivery, integration, and AI capabilities when they are ready. 

The roadmap also points toward a modern .NET host for headless services so customers can eventually remove .NET Framework from that part of the stack.

The webinar highlighted a few areas of future development:

• A modern editing experience. Sitecore is developing a responsive editor that combines page and content editing, brings workflow actions into context, and integrates Sitecore Stream. It is expected to coexist with the current editors during the transition.
• Protection for existing websites. Many established Sitecore implementations use the Model–View–Controller (MVC) architecture. Sitecore intends to continue supporting these websites by maintaining a dedicated .NET Framework Content Delivery server, avoiding a compulsory rebuild to stay on the platform.
• A clearer path to headless. Headless delivery separates content management from the customer-facing application. New services on a modern .NET host will make it easier to adopt this model for selected websites or projects while retaining other parts of the existing estate.
• Modernized platform functions. Launchpad, Forms, APIs, workflow, and publishing are all on the roadmap. A unified publishing model is intended to support traditional delivery and Experience Edge without requiring a complete rearchitecture.
• AI-assisted content operations. Sitecore Stream already brings AI capabilities to Platform DXP. Model Context Protocol (MCP), a standard that lets AI assistants use approved tools and data, could also support conversational, goal-based actions through the proposed XM Marketer MCP — with human review retained.

Sitecore is following a gradual replacement model: introduce new capabilities alongside established ones, and customers decide when to adopt or retire each part. This approach lowers migration risk and allows modernization spending to follow business value instead of a vendor-imposed deadline.

For leaders, the roadmap has four practical implications:

1. Keep the platform and its modules reasonably current.
2. Reduce deep customizations that make every upgrade expensive.
3. Strengthen automated deployment and testing for more frequent releases.
4. Consider headless delivery for meaningful new initiatives, even if existing MVC sites remain in operation.

Roadmap items are not commitments or features included in XP 10.5. They do, however, show that Sitecore sees Platform DXP as an evolving product rather than a legacy system awaiting replacement.

Summing Up

Sitecore XP 10.5 gives existing customers a more secure, stable, and longer-supported foundation while preserving their current websites and authoring processes. For businesses that expect to use Platform DXP beyond the next few years, an upgrade assessment is a prudent step.

The decision should be based on support deadlines, infrastructure readiness, customization, module compatibility, and the organization’s broader modernization plans. With the right preparation, 10.5 can reduce operational risk today and create more options for headless delivery, AI-assisted work, and gradual platform renewal tomorrow.

SaM Solutions’ Sitecore team can assess your current environment, identify business and technical risks, and build a practical upgrade or modernization roadmap — from initial planning through implementation, testing, and support.

(If you prefer video content, please watch the concise video summary of this article below)

The ecommerce industry is flourishing, and it has been predicted that the retail ecommerce revenue will touch the figure of $1,838.83 billion by the year 2029. Continue reading to know more and find the best ecommerce tools to start a successful online store.

Ecommerce isn’t “the future” of retail — it’s already a huge percentage of the way we buy. Implementation of the best tools for ecommerce will help you build a store people trust, market it in a crowded space, analyze what’s working, and make it better. Ecommerce in 2026 is less about “getting online” and more about building a system that can win on convenience, trust, and iteration speed. 

And even when shoppers do reach checkout, they often don’t convert. A widely cited synthesis by Baymard Institute estimates the average documented cart abandonment rate at 70.22%, based on dozens of studies. Speed is part of that story — Google says its research indicates 53% of visits are likely to be abandoned if pages take longer than three seconds to load. 

That’s why “ecommerce tools” matter: they’re the practical levers brands use to build, market, measure, and continuously improve — without guessing.

What Are Ecommerce Tools?

Ecommerce tools are the software products and services that help you build an online store, attract traffic, convert visitors into buyers, and run the operational backend (orders, payments, reporting, support, and automation). A good tool stack doesn’t just add features — it reduces friction and accelerates learning.

The core commerce layer

This is the “front door” and “cash register” of your brand: storefront, product catalog, cart, checkout, payment processing, and order management. For example, Wix describes an ecommerce website as including a digital storefront, product pages, shopping cart, checkout, and backend features for payment processing, shipping, customer support, and marketing. 

In this layer, the big decision is usually: hosted platform vs. self-hosted flexibility. Hosted platforms emphasize speed-to-launch and managed infrastructure; open-source/self-hosted options emphasize control and extensibility. 

The growth layer

These tools help you earn and convert demand: email marketing, CRM, marketing automation, and social publishing. They’re especially valuable when the market is crowded and repeat purchases matter — because growth is often driven more by retention and channel efficiency than by “just running more ads.” 

The measurement and optimization layer

This is where you turn activity into decisions: analytics, SEO research, and experimentation. Measurement tools help you understand what’s happening; optimization tools help you change it (and prove whether the change worked). This is a direct response to real-world leaking funnels — like high abandonment rates and performance issues.

Top 10 Ecommerce Tools for the Current Year

No single tool “does ecommerce,” there are actually several top ecommerce tools that work together. The most effective stacks usually combine: a commerce platform, a measurement system, and a small set of tools to drive and convert demand — plus experimentation and automation once the basics are stable.

Shopify

Shopify positions itself as an all-in-one commerce platform for starting, running, and growing a business online and in-store, covering core functions like store creation, selling across channels, and managing products, inventory, payments, shipping, and marketing.

BigCommerce

BigCommerce describes itself as a flexible “Open SaaS” ecommerce platform — combining managed SaaS security with customization flexibility. For many brands, it’s positioned as a commerce platform you can grow into without re-platforming early.

WooCommerce

WooCommerce is positioned in the WordPress ecosystem as an open-source ecommerce platform. The WordPress plugin directory states that WooCommerce’s core platform is free, and that open source means you retain ownership of your store’s content and data.

Wix

Wix positions its ecommerce offering as an “AI-powered ecommerce platform” designed to help businesses build, run, and scale — combining templates, no-code tools, and operational features in one dashboard.

Mailchimp

Mailchimp is a marketing platform centered on email (and related automation), with tiered plans and contact-based pricing. Mailchimp’s own documentation outlines plan constraints such as contact limits and monthly send limits by plan.

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a widely used measurement platform for understanding customer journeys, traffic sources, and conversion behavior. Google’s own setup guidance explicitly describes Analytics as providing insights “at no cost.”

Buffer

Buffer is a social media publishing and engagement tool that helps ecommerce brands maintain consistent social presence — often a meaningful driver of awareness and top-of-funnel demand.

HubSpot

HubSpot is a customer platform that spans CRM, marketing, sales, service, and (increasingly) commerce-related workflows. For ecommerce brands, its value is often in lifecycle orchestration: connecting marketing, pipeline, support, and customer data.

Ahrefs

Ahrefs is an SEO research suite used for keyword discovery, competitor analysis, backlink research, and rank tracking — often foundational for ecommerce content creation strategy and product demand capture.

Optimizely

Optimizely is an experience and experimentation platform best known (in ecommerce contexts) for A/B testing, personalization, and experimentation programs that help brands improve conversion rates and customer experiences.

Why Choose SaM Solutions for Ecommerce Development?

Choosing the right ecommerce partner goes far beyond finding a team that can simply build a store. It requires experts who understand how ecommerce operates in the real world — where platforms must scale, integrate seamlessly, and continuously evolve under growing business demands. This is where SaM Solutions stands out.

SaM Solutions approaches ecommerce as a complete ecosystem, not a one-time project. From the very beginning, the focus is on creating resilient, high-performing solutions that support complex integrations, smooth platform migrations, and ongoing optimization. With deep expertise across leading platforms such as SAP Commerce (Hybris), Sitecore Experience Commerce, Sitecore OrderCloud, Adobe Commerce (Magento), Emporix, and Salesforce B2C/B2B Commerce, SaM Solutions helps businesses select and implement the right technology stack for their specific goals.

What truly differentiates SaM Solutions is its end-to-end delivery model. The team supports the entire lifecycle — from business analysis and architecture to UX/UI design, development, integration, testing, and long-term support — ensuring continuous growth and adaptability.

Real-world success proves this approach. A strong example is the award-winning SAP Commerce solution delivered for Telekom Slovenije, enabling efficient multi-channel sales. Projects like this reflect a practical, results-driven mindset focused on solving real business challenges and delivering measurable impact.

Conclusion

Ecommerce domain in 2026 is big enough — and competitive enough — that “good enough” tooling shows up fast in your metrics. The best ecommerce stacks are the ones that make improvement easier: a solid store platform, lifecycle marketing that compounds, analytics you trust, SEO insight that reduces guessing, and testing that turns opinions into evidence. Whether you build on Shopify, BigCommerce, WooCommerce, or Wix, the consistent winners tend to be the brands that measure honestly, automate intelligently, and treat optimization as a continuous process — not a one-time project.

(If you prefer video content, please watch the concise video summary of this article below)

In the digital experience era, businesses are under pressure to deliver content seamlessly across websites, mobile apps, kiosks, voice assistants, and more. Traditional content management systems (CMS) often struggle to keep up with these omnichannel demands and rapid innovation cycles​. This is where headless CMS comes into play. It decouples the back-end content repository from the front-end presentation, delivering content via APIs to any device or channel. The result is greater flexibility, scalability, and agility in how content is delivered. It’s no surprise that organizations are rapidly adopting this architecture – by 2021, 64% of businesses were using headless approaches (a 25% jump from 2019), and 85% cited improved agility and performance as a primary reason for the switch​. 

In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore what a headless CMS is, Sitecore’s strategy and architecture, implementation approaches, real-world use cases, future trends, and why partnering with a specialist like SaM Solutions can accelerate your success.

What is a Headless CMS?

A headless CMS is a content management system where the “head” – the front-end presentation layer – is separated (decoupled) from the back-end content repository​. In practical terms, this means content creators use the CMS to author and manage content, but that content can be delivered to any digital platform (website, mobile app, smartwatch, IoT device, etc.) through web services or APIs. The front-end developers are free to use any framework or technology to present the content, whether it’s a React web app, a native mobile application, or a digital sign. This decoupling provides a single source of truth for content and enables true omnichannel delivery – content is created once in the CMS and reused across many channels​.

Sitecore’s Headless Strategy

Is Sitecore a headless CMS? The platform has been a pioneer in digital experience management, and interestingly, aspects of headless architecture have been part of Sitecore’s DNA for years. In fact, Sitecore’s content management and delivery were historically decoupled (the CMS could communicate with the presentation layer via APIs), though this wasn’t heavily marketed in early days​. Today, with the industry’s buzz around headless, it explicitly positions itself as a “hybrid-headless” CMS – meaning it can function in a traditional coupled mode, a fully headless mode, or a mix of both, depending on business needs.

Sitecore’s headless strategy focuses on giving organizations the flexibility of headless architecture without sacrificing the powerful digital marketing capabilities that the platform is known for. This strategy has several key pillars:

Sitecore JavaScript Services (JSS) and Headless Services

Introduced around Sitecore 9, this set of tools enabled developers to use modern JavaScript frameworks (React, Angular, Vue) to build Sitecore-driven experiences. In Sitecore 9.1 and later, Sitecore rolled out an umbrella of headless capabilities (formerly called “Sitecore Omni”) including JSS, a Layout API, and other services​ – effectively a bridge between the CMS and front-end apps. These allowed content to be created in Sitecore and consumed headlessly on any platform, while still leveraging Sitecore’s personalization, testing, and analytics​.

Hybrid architecture

The platform recognizes that many enterprises can’t or won’t switch to purely headless overnight. Its platform supports a hybrid model where some sites or pages use traditional MVC rendering, while others use headless/API-driven delivery. This lets organizations transition to headless gradually, or use headless for some channels (e.g., a mobile app) and traditional for others, all from the same content repository.

Composable DXP vision

In recent years, the platform has aggressively shifted towards a composable digital experience platform strategy – breaking its product into flexible, SaaS-based components. Their acquisitions of headless SaaS products (Content Hub, OrderCloud, etc.) and the development of Sitecore XM Cloud underscore this strategy​. Headless is a core aspect of composability. Sitecore’s end goal is to be fully cloud-native, MACH-compliant (Microservices, API-first, Cloud, Headless) so that each component of the digital experience (content, commerce, personalization, search) is modular and best-of-breed​. The headless CMS is the foundation of this composable approach, enabling Sitecore’s various services to plug in or be swapped as needed.

Sitecore’s Headless Architecture

From an architecture perspective, Sitecore headless deployments introduce a clear separation between the platform’s back-end and the front-end rendering host. Here’s how it works in broad strokes:

• Sitecore CMS back end (Content Hub/Experience Platform): This is where content authors and marketers work, using either Sitecore XM (Experience Manager) or XP (Experience Platform) interfaces to manage content, media, personalization rules, etc. In a headless setup, the backend is essentially an API content server. Sitecore’s core content management, workflow, and analytics engines run here as usual. The difference is that instead of coupling with Sitecore’s own rendering engine, the content (and layout definitions) are exposed via web services. Sitecore’s Headless Services module provides endpoints such as the Layout Service (to fetch page layout and content as JSON), the GraphQL Content API, and others to retrieve content on demand​.
  
• Rendering Host (Front-end application): The rendering host is a separate application (for example, a Next.js app, React app, Angular app, etc.) responsible for presentation. This app makes calls to Sitecore’s APIs to fetch content and display it. Because it’s decoupled, this rendering host can be hosted anywhere (on Node.js, Vercel, static CDN, etc.). The platform provides SDKs for JavaScript that make it easier to connect to the platform (the JSS SDK), but theoretically any application that can call an API could serve as a front-end. In production, many choose to deploy these front-ends as server-side rendered apps or statically generated sites distributed via CDNs for maximum speed and scalability.
  
• Headless Services Layer: Between the CMS and the front-end lies Sitecore’s headless services layer (either on the Sitecore instance or cloud). This includes:
  
  • The Layout Service which delivers structured content and presentation data as JSON​.
    
  • The GraphQL endpoint which exposes content in a flexible queryable manner (particularly used with Sitecore Experience Edge – more on that soon).
    
  • Other utilities like a Dictionary Service (for localization content), a Tracking API (to record user interactions from the front-end back into Sitecore’s analytics), and a Media API for media delivery​.
    
• Personalization & testing: One of the standout features of Sitecore’s headless architecture is that it strives to retain personalization and testing capabilities even in headless mode​. Traditional headless CMS products often forgo this, but the platform can still personalize content per user and run multivariate tests by evaluating user context on the backend and sending the appropriate variant content to the front-end. In a headless architecture, the front-end might ask the platform “give me the layout for user X on page Y” and Sitecore’s brain (Experience Database and rules engine) computes that, then returns the tailored content to be rendered. This way, marketers don’t lose the ability to target and tailor experiences when moving to headless.

Advantages of Using Sitecore as a Headless CMS

Choosing the platform as your headless CMS offers unique advantages by combining the flexibility of headless with Sitecore’s enterprise-grade digital experience features. Let’s explore the key benefits:

Enhanced flexibility and omnichannel delivery

A headless Sitecore implementation grants you the freedom to deliver content to any channel or device with ease. You’re not constrained by Sitecore’s default presentation layer, which means you can build native mobile apps, single-page web apps, smart TV interfaces, or AR/VR experiences all using the same content repository. This flexibility is crucial for omnichannel marketing – customers get a consistent experience whether they interact via a website, mobile app, or in-store screen. According to a WP Engine global survey, 81% of CMOs agree that headless tech makes it easier to deliver a consistent content experience across channels​. Sitecore’s headless architecture enables “create once, publish everywhere,” ensuring you can meet customers wherever they are.

Improved performance and scalability

Speed and scalability are critical for modern digital platforms – delays of even a second can impact user engagement and conversion rates. Sitecore’s headless mode can significantly improve performance. By decoupling the frontend, you can leverage techniques like static site generation or server-side rendering on globally distributed CDNs. Instead of each page being assembled on-the-fly by the platform (as in a traditional implementation), pages can be pre-built and served from edge locations, drastically reducing load times​. One study noted that a headless approach yielded a 50% improvement in Core Web Vitals performance metrics for a site, thanks to efficient content delivery via CDN​.

Advanced personalization and marketing tools

Unlike many headless-only CMS platforms, the platform retains its advanced marketing features in a headless implementation. You don’t have to give up personalization, A/B testing, marketing automation, or analytics when you “lose the head.” Sitecore’s Experience Platform (XP) can track user interactions across channels and personalize content in real-time, even when delivering via an API. For example, if a user is identified as a high-value returning customer, the platform can decide (via its rules engine) to send a different content variant or promotion to the front-end for that user. This means you can continue to deliver tailored digital experiences that boost engagement and conversions – a capability that only a few headless solutions can match at Sitecore’s level of sophistication.

Developer experience and accelerated time-to-market

Sitecore headless can lead to happier development teams and faster project delivery. Front-end developers are no longer required to have deep .NET and Sitecore knowledge; they can work in the JAMstack or framework of choice and simply consume content via APIs. This opens up the talent pool – you can leverage front-end specialists and standard DevOps tooling (Node.js, Git workflows, CI/CD for front-end, etc.) to build your site. Developers benefit from modern tooling, hot-reload development, and not having to navigate legacy CMS rendering pipelines. As a result, developer productivity increases, and projects can be delivered faster​.

Implementing Sitecore Headless: Key Approaches

The platform offers multiple pathways to implement a headless architecture, ranging from on-premises solutions to fully managed cloud services. The right approach depends on your organization’s current Sitecore version, infrastructure preferences, and long-term digital strategy. Here are the key approaches to implementing Sitecore headless:

Sitecore Headless Services (JSS)

Sitecore Headless Services – historically known as Sitecore JSS (JavaScript Services) – is the foundation of Sitecore’s headless capability for traditional installations (Sitecore XP or XM). This module, available for Sitecore 9.0 update 1 and above, essentially turns your Sitecore instance into a headless content server​. It provides the suite of APIs we discussed (Layout Service, GraphQL, etc.) and integration points to allow an external rendering host to fetch and render Sitecore content​.

Sitecore Experience Edge

Sitecore Experience Edge is a cloud-native content delivery service introduced to further simplify headless delivery. It acts as a globally distributed content API for the platform content. Essentially, Experience Edge allows you to publish content from a Sitecore instance to a highly scalable cloud endpoint, from which front-end apps can query content via GraphQL (or REST) APIs​.

Sitecore XM Cloud

Sitecore XM Cloud is the latest evolution of Sitecore’s platform – a cloud-native, SaaS-based headless CMS and digital experience platform. Launched in 2022, XM Cloud takes Sitecore’s core content management capabilities (from XM/XP) and offers them as a fully managed cloud service. Notably, XM Cloud is inherently headless: it has no built-in presentation engine; content is delivered via headless APIs by design​.

Custom Headless API

The last approach is a more bespoke option: building your own custom headless API on top of the platform. Before the platform provided its official headless toolkit, some organizations implemented headless by exposing the platform’s content via the existing item web services (Item Service or OData API) or custom services. Even today, if you have extremely specialized requirements, you might consider this route – essentially treating Sitecore as a content database and writing a custom API layer to fetch content for your front ends​.

Real-World Use Cases

Adopting the platform in a headless capacity can bring tangible benefits across various industries. Let’s look at a few common use cases and how Sitecore headless shines in each:

Ecommerce platforms

For ecommerce businesses, digital agility and performance directly impact revenue. Headless architecture in ecommerce allows the front-end shopping experience to be continuously optimized without disrupting the backend product catalog or order processing systems. With Sitecore headless, an online retailer can run a blazing-fast React or Next.js storefront that pulls product content, promotional content, and personalization rules from the platform. This decoupling means they can A/B test new checkout flows or site designs rapidly. The improved page speed (thanks to CDN delivery and pre-rendering) can boost conversion rates – studies have shown even a 100ms improvement can increase conversion. In fact, headless commerce has become the default for many retailers; as IDC noted, headless commerce platforms are now considered the standard option to meet modern customer expectations​.

Sitecore’s personalization engine is extremely valuable in ecommerce. You can personalize product recommendations or content based on user behavior (e.g., showing different home page content to a first-time visitor vs. a returning loyalty customer) even in a headless storefront. Also, omnichannel consistency is key: the platform can serve as a central hub for content that goes to the website, mobile shopping app, and even in-store displays, ensuring shoppers get consistent product information and branding everywhere. Companies using Sitecore OrderCloud (Sitecore’s headless commerce platform) integrated with Sitecore CMS have seen dramatic improvements – for example, Joyce Meyer Ministries modernized their ecommerce with a Sitecore headless approach and achieved a 300% improvement in content release time for marketing updates​. This meant the business could run promotions and refresh content 3 times faster than before, a critical edge in retail.

Media & publishing websites

Sitecore’s strengths in media use cases include multi-site management, localization, and personalization. In headless form, a single Sitecore instance can serve multiple publications or brands – each front-end can query the appropriate content. Performance is crucial for viral content and front-page news spikes; the headless approach with caching ensures even a sudden traffic surge (say, during breaking news) can be handled by scaling the delivery infrastructure without overwhelming the CMS. We also see media companies leveraging Sitecore’s personalization to recommend content (e.g., “related articles”) based on a user’s reading history, improving engagement and time-on-site.

Enterprise corporate websites

Large enterprises often have complex corporate websites with multiple divisions, multilingual content, and integration with various systems. Traditionally, such sites built on the platform might be managed in a coupled way, but moving to headless yields benefits in maintainability and future-proofing. An enterprise can redesign sections of their site (or roll out microsites for campaigns) using a headless approach without affecting the core CMS.

For example, consider a global company with a corporate site and separate investor relations site and a careers site. With Sitecore headless, they can serve all these from one Sitecore instance for content, but have different front-end codebases or teams managing each experience. The investor site could be a fast static site for press releases and reports (focusing on performance), the careers site could be an app-like experience integrating with an ATS (Applicant Tracking System) using React, and the main site might be a traditional site – all pulling content from the platform via APIs. This modular development approach is much easier to manage than a single monolithic site trying to do everything. It also allows the enterprise to incrementally modernize – perhaps rebuilding one section headlessly as a pilot, then expanding.

Future Trends in Sitecore Headless

As we look ahead, several trends are shaping the future of the platform and headless CMS in general:

• Deeper AI Integration: AI is making waves in content management – from AI-generated content to AI-driven personalization. The platform has already started adding AI capabilities (e.g., auto-tagging in Content Hub, or the AI enhancements in XM Cloud mentioned in press releases). In a headless context, we might see AI assisting with content retrieval and assembly. For instance, an intelligent content API could decide what content to fetch based on context (almost a self-driving content API). Also, AI-based optimization could run in the background – analyzing which headless content variations perform best and adjusting personalization rules on the fly. Sitecore’s leadership has hinted at AI being a key part of their roadmap, aligning with trends in the industry.
  
  
• Headless commerce and omni-channel journeys: With Sitecore named a leader in headless commerce platforms​, expect convergence of CMS and commerce in headless form. Future digital experiences will blend content and commerce fluidly (the classic “content + commerce” vision). Sitecore’s tools will likely make it easier to embed buy flows, product content, etc., within content experiences delivered headlessly. For example, a headless Sitecore site could pull in product data from OrderCloud seamlessly alongside marketing content, all orchestrated via API. This is key for industries like retail and consumer goods, where storytelling and shopping merge.
  

Sitecore, Software Development, Technologies & Tools

Sitecore Implementation Plan: A Step-By-Step Guide

Sitecore, Software Development, Technologies & Tools

[TechSpeak] Removing Orphaned Renderings in Sitecore

Why Choose SaM Solutions for Sitecore Development?

SaM Solutions has over a decade of experience delivering Sitecore projects (providing Sitecore development since 2012) and has completed hundreds of unique Sitecore implementations across various industries​. Our Sitecore practice is led by top talent, including a team supervised by a four-time Sitecore MVP (Most Valuable Professional)​. This recognition from Sitecore indicates exceptional knowledge and community contribution. In practice, it means SaM Solutions’ experts are up-to-date with the latest Sitecore advancements and have direct lines of communication with Sitecore’s product teams. When you work with SaM Solutions, you’re getting consultants who are thought leaders in the Sitecore field. 

Conclusion

For organizations considering the next step in their digital experience journey, the message is clear: headless is here to stay, and the platform offers one of the most robust paths to embrace it. Whether you plan a gradual transition (hybrid headless) or a leap to the cloud (XM Cloud), aligning with experienced partners like SaM Solutions can ensure you navigate this evolution smoothly and reap maximum ROI. By leveraging Sitecore Headless CMS, you position your business to deliver consistent, engaging, and personalized experiences on any device – a critical capability in an era where customer experience is the ultimate differentiator.

(If you prefer video content, please watch the concise video summary of this article below)

Implementing Sitecore without a solid plan is like setting off on a road trip without a map. Sitecore is a powerful digital experience platform (DXP) that combines content management, customer data, and marketing tools into one robust solution. But with great power comes complexity. Whether you’re building a brand-new Sitecore website or migrating from another CMS, you need a clear Sitecore implementation plan to ensure success. By planning carefully and following a step-by-step process, you can deliver all the required functionality on time and within budget, providing a seamless experience for your users. In this guide, we’ll walk through everything from understanding Sitecore’s architecture and pre-project planning to development, deployment, and post-launch optimization. Let’s dive in!

What Is Sitecore?

Sitecore is an enterprise digital experience platform and content management system (CMS) known for its flexibility and powerful features. More than just a CMS, it allows organizations to create, manage, and personalize content across multiple channels (web, mobile, email, etc.) from one central hub.

Sitecore’s Architecture

Sitecore’s architecture is modular and scalable, designed to support enterprise needs. At a high level, the platform is built on a .NET framework and follows an architecture that separates content management from content delivery for efficiency and security. Let’s break down some core components and concepts:

Core components

Sitecore’s modular, .NET-based architecture separates content management (CM) from content delivery (CD) for security and performance. The Experience Platform (XP) includes CMS plus analytics, personalization, and testing, while Experience Manager (XM) offers core CMS features without marketing tools. CM handles content creation in a secure back  end, connected to the master database. CD servers deliver published content to users from the web database, typically behind a load balancer for scalability and high availability.

Headless vs. traditional MVC

In Sitecore, traditional MVC tightly couples content and presentation using ASP.NET, allowing in-context editing and simpler architecture but limiting flexibility. Headless decouples content delivery, using APIs (like JSS and GraphQL) to feed modern front ends (e.g., React, Next.js), enabling omnichannel delivery and developer freedom but adding complexity and reducing native editing capabilities.

Pre-Implementation Planning

Before any development begins, thorough planning is essential. Rushing into Sitecore setup without clear requirements can lead to scope creep, rework, or an implementation that doesn’t meet your business needs. In this phase, you’ll define what you need to build and how you’ll build it. Key planning steps include:

Business and technical requirements

Start by gathering and documenting all requirements — this is your project’s foundation. Involve stakeholders from both the business side and IT.

What are you trying to achieve with the new Sitecore site? List the primary objectives (e.g., improve user engagement, enable personalization, support online sales, manage multiple country sites, etc.). Outline the required features and functionality. This might include things like a blog/news section, product catalog, search bar with filtering, contact forms, personalization rules (“show X promo to returning visitors”), multilingual content, user login or profile management, etc. Prioritize these features (Must-Have, Nice-to-Have) to guide development focus.

Plan how your content will be organized. What content types do you need (e.g., Article, Product, Landing Page, Homepage, etc.)? For each type, consider what fields it should have (title, body, images, etc.) and how they relate. Determine who will use the Sitecore CMS (content authors, editors, marketers, developers) and what their permissions should be.

Infrastructure and licensing

Sitecore relies on a search engine for its content indexing and site search functionalities. As part of infrastructure planning, decide on the search provider. Since Sitecore 9, Solr has been the default search engine (you’ll need to set up a Solr server or cluster). If you are in Azure, Azure Cognitive Search is also an option, or even ElasticSearch with some custom work. Plan the installation and configuration of this search service and ensure it’s sized appropriately. (For example, for Solr you might need to allocate enough RAM and decide if it’s a cloud-managed Solr vs your own instance.) We will configure search in the implementation steps, but it’s important to account for it now and make sure your license/environment supports it.

Sitecore licenses come in different editions (corresponding to XM, XP, and additional modules like XC for commerce). Licensing can be perpetual or subscription-based. Most modern deployments use a subscription model (often yearly) that covers a certain level of traffic and includes support. Make sure you obtain the right type of license for your needs: if you need the full XP capabilities, you’ll license XP (which includes xConnect, etc.). If not, an XM license might be more cost-effective. Also consider add-ons: e.g., if you plan to use Email Experience Manager or Sitecore Commerce, those might require additional licensing or specific arrangements.

Sitecore Implementing Plan

A structured approach will keep the project on track. Below is a step-by-step plan that covers setting up the technical foundation, building out features, and launching the solution. Depending on your project, some steps might happen in parallel, but we’ll present them in a logical sequence for clarity.

Step 1: Set up development environment

The first implementation step is preparing a development environment where your team can start building the Sitecore solution. This involves installing Sitecore and all necessary components in a sandbox that mirrors what you intend for production (as closely as possible). 

Using the Sitecore Installation Framework (SIF) or installation packages provided by Sitecore, install the required Sitecore version on your dev environment. Typically, this means installing the Sitecore CMS itself, the Core/Master/Web databases (often on SQL Server), and configuring the Solr search service. 

You’ll need to apply your Sitecore license file to the installation. Once installed, verify that the Sitecore instance comes up correctly by logging into the Sitecore Launchpad (the CMS dashboard) on your development machine. This ensures the base installation is successful.

Set up your development tools and project structure. This often means creating a Visual Studio solution following Sitecore Helix architecture conventions: separate projects for Feature modules, Foundation modules, etc. If Helix is new to your team, invest a bit of time setting up the solution structure properly now (it pays off in maintainability).

Step 2: Configure databases & search

With the environment up, the next step is configuring Sitecore’s databases and the search functionality, which are critical underpinnings for your site:

• Database configuration: Sitecore uses multiple SQL databases. The primary ones are Core, Master, and Web. You should ensure these were created and are accessible. The Core database stores application settings and user security info, Master is the content authoring database (all versions of content items live here), and Web is the live published content. If you’re using XP, you will also have additional databases like the xConnect Collection database (to store analytics data about contacts and interactions), a Reporting database, etc. Verify the connection strings in Sitecore’s configuration for all required databases. At this stage, it’s wise to double-check that your Master and Web databases are set up with proper backup schedules as well (especially as content gets added). In development, you might not worry about backups, but for production planning you should.
  
• Index and search setup: Sitecore’s search index needs to be configured. By default, Sitecore comes with configuration files for Solr or Azure search, but you have to set up the actual index schemas. If using Solr, you’ll create several cores. Sitecore provides scripts or PowerShell modules to create these Solr cores with the correct schema. Run those to establish the indexes. Then, from the Sitecore Control Panel, you can initiate a rebuild of all indexes to populate them with initial data. This ensures that content you add or modify can be searched efficiently.
  

Step 3: Build front end (JSS/MVC/Headless)

Now the real fun begins: implementing the website’s features and frontend. This step is typically the longest, as it involves both back-end template setup and front-end user interface development. The exact tasks will differ if you chose traditional MVC vs headless (as discussed earlier), but we’ll cover both angles. 

Using Sitecore’s Content Editor, create data templates for all the content types identified in your planning. 

For a traditional MVC implementation, set up layouts and renderings in Sitecore.

If you’re going headless, you will focus more on your separate front-end app. For instance, using Sitecore JSS with React, you’d create a React project. Define components in React that correspond to your planned Sitecore components. 

Common site elements like the navigation menu or a search page will need special attention. For navigation, you might create a rendering that queries the content tree for pages to display in the menu (leveraging Sitecore’s content structure). For search, you’ll build a search results page that runs queries against the index (for MVC, that could be using Sitecore ContentSearch API in C#; for headless, maybe an API endpoint that your front-end calls, or using Sitecore’s OData Search API). Ensure these are working with the content you have.Apply your UX/UI design to the components. Front-end developers will write CSS/SCSS, JavaScript, and HTML markup within the MVC views or the headless app to match your design mockups. If using an approach like Sitecore SXA, you’d leverage its theme and grid system for faster development – but assuming custom development here, ensure that the site is responsive and accessible as per your requirements.

Step 4: Integrate ecommerce features

If your Sitecore implementation involves online shopping or product catalog features, step 4 is all about tying in ecommerce. Sitecore doesn’t include ecommerce by default (unless you have Sitecore Experience Commerce), but it’s designed to integrate smoothly with external commerce platforms or modules. Here’s how to approach it:

• Decide on commerce approach: There are two main paths: using Sitecore Experience Commerce (XC) or integrating a third-party ecommerce system (like Magento, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, Shopify, custom .NET commerce, etc.). If you opted for Sitecore’s own commerce platform, you should have that provisioned along with your Sitecore install. If using an external system, you’ll likely use Sitecore Commerce Connect framework or custom APIs to connect. Ensure the decision is made and necessary software or connectors are installed.
  
• Product catalog in Sitecore: Determine how product data will be accessed in Sitecore. For Sitecore XC, the product catalog is imported into Sitecore as items under a Catalog item. In an external integration scenario, you might not store full product data in Sitecore; instead, you might pull data on demand. However, many implementations at least cache or sync some product information into Sitecore to use personalization and search effectively.
• Shopping cart and checkout: Implement the shopping cart and checkout user flows. If using Sitecore XC, you will leverage its Engine APIs and storefront components. For external systems, this likely involves building a custom cart controller in Sitecore that interacts with the ecommerce platform’s API. 

Step 5: Test & deploy

Before launch, load and review all content, ensuring key pages and localization are in place. Run functional, performance, and security tests to verify features, stability, and access controls. Conduct User Acceptance Testing to get stakeholder sign-off. Prepare a detailed deployment plan for code, content, and databases, then do a smoke test before switching DNS. Launch during low-traffic hours with a content freeze, and monitor the site post-deployment for errors, analytics, and integration issues, with a rollback plan if needed.

Post-Implementation & Optimization

Launching a Sitecore-powered website is only the beginning of the product lifecycle. Post-implementation, your focus shifts to maintaining the system, supporting content teams, and leveraging Sitecore’s features to optimize the user experience. This phase is about keeping the engine running and fine-tuning it for even better results.

Maintenance and upgrades

Establish a schedule for routine maintenance tasks. This includes monitoring logs for errors or warnings and addressing them proactively. Clear out old publishing queues or archives if they grow large, and monitor the size of databases (especially the logging/analytics DBs in XP, which can grow quickly). If you’re using Marketing features, rebuild analytics indexes periodically to keep reporting smooth.

Ensure you have a support process. If you partnered with a Sitecore implementer or partner like SaM Solutions, you likely have a support contract. Use it to get help for any complex issues or questions. Sitecore itself provides support to its customers (for core platform issues). Make sure any critical issues are raised and tracked promptly. It’s good to keep a knowledge base of common tasks or past solutions your team encountered during implementation – this helps new team members and speeds up troubleshooting.

Scaling and A/B testing

Post-launch is also the time to think about enhancement and optimization opportunities, particularly scaling up your success and using Sitecore’s marketing capabilities like A/B testing to improve the site over time.

If your site usage increases (which is a good thing – more visitors, more customers!), ensure your solution scales with it. Scalability isn’t only about hardware – sometimes code needs scaling too. If a particular component or process is slow under heavy use, optimize that code (e.g., reduce a heavy database call or add caching). Regular load testing even after launch (perhaps quarterly) can help catch issues before they affect real users.

Why Choose SaM Solutions For Sitecore Website Development?

Implementing Sitecore is a significant undertaking — it demands deep product knowledge, technical expertise, and careful planning. This is where choosing the right partner can make all the difference. With over a decade of experience in Sitecore development, SaM Solutions has worked on numerous implementations across various industries. We have a dedicated team of certified Sitecore developers, architects, and consultants who stay up-to-date with the latest versions and best practices. Whether it’s implementing the latest architecture patterns (like Helix and SXA) or leveraging new features (such as Sitecore AI personalization or XM Cloud), our experts have the know-how. We bring this expertise to your project to ensure it’s built on a solid, modern foundation.

Sitecore, Software Development, Technologies & Tools

[TechSpeak] Removing Orphaned Renderings in Sitecore

Sitecore

Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud (XM Cloud) [Complete Guide]

SAP CX, Sitecore, Software Development

Custom vs. Off-the-Shelf Content Management System (CMS): How to Choose

Conclusion

A successful Sitecore implementation is the result of careful planning, skilled execution, and ongoing improvement. By following a structured plan — from understanding the architecture to setting up the right infrastructure, methodically developing features, and rigorously testing before launch — you set the stage for a smooth deployment and a high-quality site. Remember that Sitecore is a powerful platform; to truly unlock its potential, you need not just initial development but also continuous optimization post-launch (through A/B testing, personalization, and regular updates).

If this sounds like a lot, it’s because it is! But you don’t have to go it alone. Many organizations find that partnering with experienced professionals (like the team at SaM Solutions) is the key to navigating the complexity of a Sitecore project. A good partner will bring best practices, a talented team, and a proven process to ensure your implementation delivers the results you expect — and more.

Problem

While working on a current content project in Sitecore 10, I encountered a frustrating issue: when removing a component that contains a placeholder, Sitecore deletes only the parent rendering but leaves all nested child renderings behind in the layout field (__Renderings). As a result, orphaned components are created. They will never be rendered but still remain in the item’s layout, leading to unnecessary clutter, rendering issues, and potential performance degradation.

When working with Sitecore’s dynamic placeholders, child components are often assigned within parent renderings. However, if a parent rendering is deleted, Sitecore does not automatically clean up the child renderings that were nested inside its placeholder. 

These orphaned components:

• Remain stored in the layout field (__Renderings).
• Are not visible on the page, even though they still exist in the data structure.
• Can cause broken layouts, unused placeholders, and excess rendering data.

Solution

So, how do we clean up these orphaned renderings? Let’s dive into the fix.

As part of the solution, we implemented an event handler for item:saved to validate whether a rendering with a nested placeholder was removed, potentially leaving orphaned renderings. If orphaned renderings are detected, they are removed, and the layout field is reserialized.

using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Sitecore;
using Sitecore.Data.Fields;
using Sitecore.Data.Items;
using Sitecore.Events;
using Sitecore.Layouts;

namespace YourNamespace.Sitecore.Events
{
    public class DeleteOrphanRenderingsHandler
    {
        private const string DefaultDeviceId = "{FECA918C-40C4-4F99-8CF6-BE64DAF8FC32}"; // Default Sitecore device ID
        private const string PlaceholderFormat = "-{0}-"; // Format for placeholders in Sitecore
        private const string LocalDataSourcePrefix = "local:"; // Prefix for local data sources

        public void OnItemSaved(object sender, EventArgs args)
        {
            if (!(Event.ExtractParameter(args, 0) is Item savedItem) ||
                !(Event.ExtractParameter(args, 1) is ItemChanges itemChanges) ||
                itemChanges.IsEmpty)
            {
                return;
            }

            foreach (var fieldId in new[] { Sitecore.FieldIDs.LayoutField, Sitecore.FieldIDs.FinalLayoutField })
            {
                if (!itemChanges.FieldChanges.Contains(fieldId))
                    continue;

                // Important check: If Context.Item is null, local data sources may break (render empty)
                if (Context.Item == null)
                {
                    Context.Item = savedItem;
                }

                var updatedField = itemChanges.FieldChanges[fieldId];
                var updatedFieldValue = updatedField.Value;
                var originalFieldValue = updatedField.OriginalValue;

                if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(originalFieldValue) || string.IsNullOrEmpty(updatedFieldValue))
                    continue;

                var originalLayout = LayoutDefinition.Parse(originalFieldValue);
                var updatedLayout = LayoutDefinition.Parse(updatedFieldValue);

                var deviceId = Context.Device?.ID.ToString() ?? DefaultDeviceId;
                var originalDevice = originalLayout.GetDevice(deviceId);
                var updatedDevice = updatedLayout.Devices.Cast<DeviceDefinition>()
                    .FirstOrDefault(x => x.ID == deviceId);

                if (updatedDevice == null || originalDevice == null)
                {
                    continue;
                }

                var updateLayoutField = (LayoutField)savedItem.Fields[fieldId];
                
                var originalRenderings = originalDevice.Renderings.Cast<RenderingDefinition>().ToArray();
                var updatedRenderingsFromLayout = updateLayoutField.GetReferences(Context.Device).ToList();

                var removeResult = RemoveOrphanedRenderings(originalRenderings, updatedRenderingsFromLayout);
                if (!removeResult.wasUpdated) continue;

                var mappedRenderings = removeResult.updatedRenderings.Select(x =>
                {
                    var dataSourcePath = x.Settings.DataSource;
                    return new RenderingDefinition
                    {
                        UniqueId = x.UniqueId,
                        Placeholder = x.Placeholder,
                        ItemID = x.RenderingID.ToString(),
                        Parameters = x.Settings.Parameters,
                        Datasource = ConvertToLocalDataSource(savedItem.Paths.FullPath, dataSourcePath)
                    };
                }).ToList();

                updatedDevice.Renderings = new ArrayList(mappedRenderings);
                
                savedItem.Editing.BeginEdit();
                // If we use LayoutField.SetFieldValue(), the layout will be missing for the item.
                savedItem.Fields[fieldId].Value = updatedLayout.ToXml();
                
                // Prevent second item:save event
                savedItem.Editing.EndEdit(true);
            }
        }

        private static (bool wasUpdated, List<RenderingReference> updatedRenderings) RemoveOrphanedRenderings(
            RenderingDefinition[] originalRenderings,
            List<RenderingReference> updatedRenderings
        )
        {
            var wasUpdated = false;
            var removedRenderings = originalRenderings
                .Where(orig => updatedRenderings.All(updated => updated.UniqueId != orig.UniqueId))
                .ToList();

            if (!removedRenderings.Any()) return (false, updatedRenderings);

            foreach (var removedRendering in removedRenderings)
            {
                var updatedRenderingsTemp = updatedRenderings
                    .RemoveWhere(x => x.Placeholder.Contains(string.Format(PlaceholderFormat, removedRendering.UniqueId))).ToList();

                if (updatedRenderingsTemp.Count != updatedRenderings.Count)
                {
                    wasUpdated = true;
                }

                updatedRenderings = updatedRenderingsTemp.ToList();
            }

            return (wasUpdated, updatedRenderings);
        }
        
        private static string ConvertToLocalDataSource(string savedItemFullPath, string absoluteDataSourcePath)
        {
            if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(savedItemFullPath) || string.IsNullOrEmpty(absoluteDataSourcePath))
                return absoluteDataSourcePath; 
        
            if (absoluteDataSourcePath.StartsWith(savedItemFullPath, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
            {
                var localPath = absoluteDataSourcePath.Substring(savedItemFullPath.Length).TrimStart('/');
                return $"{LocalDataSourcePrefix}{localPath}";
            }
            return absoluteDataSourcePath;
        }
    }
}

The configuration file should be placed under the App_Config folder, following your project’s folder structure. If you are using the Helix architecture, I recommend placing it under App_Config/Include/Foundation

<configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/">
  <sitecore>
    <events>
      <event name="item:saved">
        <handler type="YourNamespace.Sitecore.Events.DeleteOrphanRenderingsHandler, YourNamespace.Sitecore"
                 method="OnItemSaved" resolve="true"/>  
      </event>
    </events>
  </sitecore>
</configuration>

Some Interesting Moments from the Code Above

Set Context.Item to the current saved item manually

When handling Sitecore’s item:saved event, Context.Item is not automatically set to the saved item, even if resolve="true" is specified in the configuration file. This leads to issues when resolving local data sources (e.g., local:/Data/RichTextDatasource) because Sitecore relies on Context.Item for resolution.

Without explicitly setting Context.Item, the following problem occurs:

• updateLayoutField.GetReferences(Context.Device); loads local data sources as empty strings (“”).
• All renderings that had local data sources will lose their assigned values.
• This causes unexpected behavior and potential errors on the website.

Fix: manually set Context.Item

To ensure correct resolution, manually set Context.Item before processing:

    if (Context.Item == null)
    {
		    Context.Item = savedItem;
    }

Using direct field set instead of LayoutField.SetFieldValue()

Using LayoutField.SetFieldValue() was found to remove the assigned layout, preventing the page from rendering properly.

savedItem.Editing.BeginEdit();
savedItem.Fields[fieldId].Value = updatedLayout.ToXml();

// Prevent second item:save event
savedItem.Editing.EndEdit(true);

ConvertToLocalDataSource function

Datasource = ConvertToLocalDataSource(savedItem.Paths.FullPath, dataSourcePath)

The ConvertToLocalDataSource function was introduced to convert absolute data source paths to local relative paths when possible. This helps simplify the maintenance of data source items, especially when the parent item is renamed, ensuring that data sources remain correctly linked.

Purpose of this function

• Converts absolute paths (e.g., /sitecore/content/Home/Data/Item) to local paths (local:Data/Item) when applicable.
• Ensures that data sources remain correctly associated with their parent item.
• Prevents issues where renaming a parent item breaks hardcoded absolute paths.

This approach helps keep data sources flexible and reduces the risk of broken references when items are moved or renamed in Sitecore.

P. S.

Thank you for reading! I’m planning to share more about the challenges I encounter in Sitecore development. Stay tuned for more insights!

(If you prefer video content, please watch the concise video summary of this article below)

A content management system (CMS) is a crucial tool for any modern business. It provides a central hub for content creation, editing, storage, and distribution, allowing multiple users to collaborate and streamline these processes. A CMS helps companies and individuals to arrange their online presence and engage with the audience in a user-friendly and organized manner.

Building a CMS can seem challenging, but it doesn’t have to be. With the right approach and a reliable software provider, anyone can create a system that meets their unique requirements. In this article, we will compare custom CMS development with using an existing CMS platform and help you choose between the two options.

Benefits of Using a CMS 

Content management systems have become mainstream in the world of digital businesses due to a variety of benefits they provide. Let’s look at the key advantages of a CMS:

• Simplified content creation. CMSs have intuitive user interfaces that allow non-technical users to create, publish, and edit content without the need for coding.
• Efficient content management. Since all the digital content is stored in a single place, users can find and update it with no trouble, saving time and resources.
• Consistent branding and design. A content management system is a brilliant tool for maintaining consistent branding and design across all digital channels. By using predefined templates, style guides, and branding guidelines, you can ensure that all content published through the system adheres to your brand’s standards.
• Improved collaboration. Multiple users can work simultaneously in one content management system, which results in a more efficient content development process.
• Scalability. When you first launch a website or start creating digital content, you only need a few basic features and functionalities from your CMS. However, as your organization grows, you may require more advanced features, such as personalized user experiences, ecommerce capabilities, or integration with third-party software. Content management systems are able to scale up, so they can be suitable for businesses of all sizes. 
• SEO optimization. Many CMS platforms include built-in SEO features such as meta tags, keyword optimization, and site map generation. This functionality helps improve search engine rankings.

What Is a Custom CMS?

A custom content management system is built from the ground up specifically for a particular organization’s needs. Unlike off-the-shelf CMS solutions, custom systems are designed to offer unique features and functionalities that align with the client’s objectives, business model, and user preferences. 

To get a custom-built content management system, there should be an intense collaboration between you, a client, and a software provider. While you will be giving input on the features you require, the development team will offer technical expertise to design and implement those features. Such cooperation is likely to be very time-consuming.

Real-life applications

Many organizations, including educational institutions, media companies, and government agencies, develop custom CMSs to manage their digital content. As a rule, these are large global enterprises that demand a high degree of software customization, security, and design diversity and have enough resources for the development process.

Here are the two prominent examples of companies with bespoke content management systems:

• The New York Times built a custom CMS called Scoop to handle the specific needs of a large news organization, including the ability to manage multiple users, workflows, and editorial calendars.
• Tesla uses a custom Tesla CMS to manage its website and online store. The CMS is designed to provide a seamless user experience with easy navigation, product customization, and online ordering.

What Is a CMS Platform?

A CMS platform – or off-the-shelf CMS – is a pre-built software application that is designed to provide a variety of features to multiple users. Solutions of this type offer a wide range of templates, themes, and plugins that allow users to customize the appearance and functionality of different websites.

What is CMS customization?

CMS customization is a process of modifying or extending a content management platform to create unique digital experiences that reflect brands and meet the specific needs of the target audience. By customizing a CMS, businesses can improve the performance and security of their website, as well as streamline their workflow and content management processes.

Customizing a CMS can be done by utilizing pre-built plugins, themes, or modules, or by writing custom code from scratch. It usually involves:

• Changing the layout
• Creating a custom design
• Adding new features
• Developing new functionality

Real-life applications

CMS platforms are used for building websites, blogs, ecommerce stores, and company intranets.

• For websites and blogs. Umbraco, Sitecore, WordPress, Drupal, Ghost, and Joomla are popular content management systems widely used to build and manage websites of all sizes and types, from personal blogs to enterprise-level corporate sites.
• For ecommerce stores. Adobe Commerce (ex-Magento), SAP Commerce (ex-Hybris), Sitecore Commerce, and Shopify are proprietary CMS that help with building online stores, allowing businesses to easily manage product catalogs, inventory, and transactions.
• For portals. Numerous healthcare, educational, and financial companies develop their portals with Umbraco, Liferay, and Plone.
• For intranets. SharePoint and Confluence are well-liked platforms for creating intranets. They provide employees with a centralized location to access company data and collaborate on various projects.

E-Commerce & CX, Sitecore

A Guide to Developing a Website Using Sitecore CMS

Custom CMS vs. Off-the-Shelf CMS: How to Decide

When choosing whether to build or customize a CMS platform, you should consider a number of factors. Below we share a comparison table: custom CMS vs. WordPress, Sitecore, Magento and other platforms. 

*At SaM Solutions, we can customize platform-based content management systems, develop new plugins and components as well as perform necessary integrations.

Launch time

Creating a custom CMS implies building the entire system out of nothing. This is a time-consuming process that involves:

• Requirement analysis and planning
• CMS architecture design
• UX and UI design
• Front-end development
• Back-end development
• Testing
• Deployment

Such a project can take months or even years, depending on the website architecture  complexity and number of supported content types.

In contrast, CMS platforms come with pre-built templates, themes, and plugins that can be set up, customized, and launched in a relatively short time. Most platforms offer a simple setup process that can be completed in a few hours or days. Additionally, CMS platforms provide hosting services, eliminating the need to search for a web host and setting up the server, which can also save time.

Ultimately, if you need to launch your website quickly, a CMS platform is a better option. If you have more time and specific requirements that are not met by existing content management system platforms, custom development is a more appropriate choice.

Customization level

Traditionally, custom content management systems offer the highest level of customization, as they are built with your unique requirements in mind. Such CMSs ensure exceptional flexibility and can satisfy all your business needs.

CMS platforms offer a wide range of features that you can customize, but the choice is still limited. It’s worth noting, however, that the customization of a CMS platform may take longer than anticipated: specific needs may require additional technical expertise and may result in more time and effort.

Hire SaM Solutions’ team – our experienced developers will help you achieve high customization even with a CMS platform. Relying on an existing platform will save you time and money, while we will ensure that the customized CMS is perfectly suited to your needs.

Team complexity

Building a custom CMS requires a team of web development specialists experienced with a range of technologies, including:

• HTML, CSS, and JavaScript frameworks  – for building a front end
• .NET, Java, Node.js, Python, or PHP – for developing a backend
• MySQL, PostgreSQL, or Oracle – for  database management. 

Using a CMS platform, on the other hand, typically implies less technical expertise. Most content management platforms are designed to be user-friendly and can be set up with little to no coding knowledge. That being said, depending on the level of customization required, technical expertise may still be needed to modify templates or plugins, or to integrate a CMS with other systems.

User experience

If you decide to develop a custom CMS, you must carefully consider the user experience (UX) aspect to ensure that the system is intuitive and easy to use. This can be a challenging task, as it requires an in-depth analysis of user needs and expectations, feedback collection, and many rounds of adjustments – both before and after the launch.

Meanwhile, off-the-shelf content management systems have already been receiving user feedback over the years. In a WordPress vs. custom CMS standoff, for instance, the former has already gone through hundreds of iterations and testing sessions, while the latter would still need to polish its user experience to cater to all possible target audiences. In other words, by relying on CMS platforms, you also rely on their time-tested experience. 

Plugins and integrations

To expand the functionality of your website, you need plugins and integrations with third-party systems. This means that plugin development and integration capabilities should become an integral part of your custom CMS creation. You will need additional development work and technical expertise to implement and maintain plugins and integrations, which won’t even be as well-tested or well-supported as those already available for off-the-shelf solutions.

Content management platforms, on the other hand, offer a wide range of pre-built plugins and integrations that can be easily added to the site. This can save time and development costs, as well as provide a more stable and supported solution. Popular CMS platforms also have large communities of developers who contribute to the creation of these plugins and integrations.

Maintenance and support costs and effort 

If you develop a custom CMS, you will have to provide ongoing maintenance and support, including version control, security patch development and update rollout. For this purpose, you’ll need a dedicated team of technical experts and regular investment in time and resources.

You will still need a tech team to manage your off-the-shelf system, but its support will require fewer resources compared to a custom CMS. This is because existing platforms deliver maintenance and support as part of their service. They provide regular updates, address issues that arise, and ensure the smooth functioning of the system. 

Note that some platforms charge fees for support or premium features, but maintenance and support costs of a custom CMS are generally higher than those of a CMS platform.

SAPCX B2C RETAIL

SAP Customer Experience Implementation at a Major Kids’ Toys and Clothing Retail Store

SITECORE B2X

Sitecore CMS Website of an Insurance Company

Should You Create Your Own CMS?

So, let’s sum up. Opt for a content management system from scratch only if you:

• Have a lot of specialized tech talent on board.
• Have highly specific content requirements that aren’t addressed by existing CMS.
• Want to create your innovative CMS product, which you’ll distribute to the market. 

In other cases, you’re better off pursuing CMS customization of available platforms.

How to Choose a CMS Platform

Now that we’ve compared custom and off-the-shelf content management systems, you may struggle choosing a single CMS platform from many existing options. Our two next sections are dedicated to helping you with this choice.

First, here are some key considerations: 

• Open source vs. proprietary CMS. While open-source CMS is cost-effective and has a large community of developers, it may require technical expertise to use and maintain. Proprietary CMS offers dedicated support but is more expensive and may have limited customization options. The choice between open source and proprietary CMS depends on your budget, team or vendor, and level of desired customization.
• Think about the needs and goals of your website. Think about your target audience, what you want your website to achieve, and what features and functionality you require. This will help you narrow down the CMS options that are best suited to your needs.
• Compare the features of each CMS. Look at the features and capabilities of each content management system you’ve chosen and compare them to your requirements. Consider factors such as ease of use, customization options, SEO capabilities, security features, and payment options.   
• Check out user reviews and ratings. Explore what users say about the options you are considering. This will give you an idea of how well they work in practice. In addition, look for platforms that have active and supportive communities, regular updates, thorough documentation, and a wide range of extensions, modules, and plugins. These are the guaranteed resources you need to get the most out of your CMS.
• Try out a demo or trial version. Before committing to a particular content management platform, try out its demo or trial version. This will give you a chance to test the system and see if it meets your requirements.

At SaM Solutions, we offer demos of our CMS platforms to help you make an informed decision. Contact us to learn more about our CMS solutions and how they can help you achieve your website goals.

CMS Options We Recommend

Sitecore

• Pricing: This premium platform offers a subscription-based license with a range of options that depend on various factors, e.g., site visits per month or add-on modules you choose.
• Key features: Sitecore offers a range of features for managing content, personalizing digital experiences, and optimizing marketing campaigns. Among such features are multi-site management, personalization, analytics and reporting, marketing campaign management, and third-party integrations.
• Tech stack: This proprietary CMS platform is built on the .NET framework and uses C# and JavaScript. Currently, Sitecore is on the way to composable technology.
• Key clients: A range of high-profile clients across various industries, including American Express, L’Oréal, and Canon, rely on Sitecore.
• Best suited for: Large enterprises that require a highly scalable and customizable CMS platform for managing complex digital experiences. Sitecore is ideal for organizations with large amounts of content, multiple websites or brands, and a need for robust personalization and analytics capabilities.

Umbraco

• Pricing: Umbraco has a free, open-source version with basic functionality, as well as a paid version with additional features and support.
• Key features: The platform offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, customizable templates and themes, and a robust set of content management tools. It also enables version control, workflow, and multi-site management.
• Tech stack: This CMS is built with the .NET framework and uses C# as its primary programming language. 
• Key clients: Some of Umbraco’s key clients include Wired UK, Heinz, Peugeot, and Microsoft.
• Best suited for: Mid-to-large-sized businesses and organizations looking for a customizable, scalable, and secure CMS solution. It is also a good fit for developers and designers who prefer the .NET development framework but don’t see Sitecore.

Magento

• Pricing: The platform’s free, open-source version is called Community Edition. There’s also Enterprise Edition – a paid version with advanced features.
• Key features: Aiming at ecommerce businesses, Magento offers customizable product catalogs, flexible pricing rules, powerful search capabilities, and integrated payment gateways. It also provides multi-language and multi-currency support, and a large selection of third-party extensions and plugins.
• Tech stack: Magento is built with the PHP programming language and uses the Zend framework. 
• Key clients: Coca-Cola, Ford, Nestle, and Nike developed their websites with Magento.
• Best suited for: Mid-to-large-sized ecommerce businesses. It is also a good fit for developers and designers who are familiar with PHP and Zend frameworks.

SAP Commerce Cloud (ex. Hybris)

• Pricing: SAP Commerce Cloud is a paid solution with pricing determined based on the size and complexity of the business.
• Key features: With this powerful CMS, you get advanced product and catalog management, search and personalization tools, omnichannel capabilities, and integrated payment and order management, let alone a wide range of integrations and extensions.
• Tech stack: The content management system by SAP is built with Java and Spring framework.
• Key clients: SAP Commerce Cloud supports the websites of Adidas, Levi’s, Samsung, and Puma.
• Best suited for: Large and premium ecommerce businesses. 

WordPress

• Pricing: WordPress is a free and open-source CMS with additional paid features and services available through third-party providers.
• Key features: This popular CMS platform provides customizable templates and themes, a user-friendly interface, and a robust set of content management tools. It also offers a large selection of plugins and integrations, as well as multi-site management capabilities.
• Tech stack: WordPress is built with PHP and uses MySQL as its database management system.
• Key clients: Among WordPress’s famous clients are BBC America, Sony Music, and Microsoft News.
• Best suited for: Small to mid-sized organizations that need a customizable and easy-to-use CMS solution. It is also a good fit for bloggers and content creators who don’t own an established company yet.

Why Choose SaM Solutions to Customize a CMS?

Our company has a good breadth of experience in CMS and portal development, particularly with Sitecore, SAP Commerce Cloud, and Magento. This means we have a deep understanding of how these systems work and how to tailor them to deliver a robust, stable, and versatile content management system.

Additionally, our software development experts always rely on web development best practices  as well as implement the latest technologies and trends in the industry. Placing a high value on communication and collaboration, we work closely with our clients to understand their individual business requirements and goals, and to ensure that the content management solution they create meets those needs. Don’t hesitate to contact our team to discuss your CMS customization project.

I have been working with Search in Sitecore for more than four years with different engines, including SOLR, Lucene and Azure Search (this is not to be confused with Azure ElasticSearch, because in version 9.2, Sitecore didn’t have an SDK to work with this one).

By this time, I’ve touched upon different scenarios of Search implementation:

• Supporting both Azure Search and SOLR at the same time
• Integrating third-party tools to provide data for a custom index
• Covering all CRUD functions for Custom Index crawler
• Increasing performance for the custom Index full-rebuild logic
• Implementing cloud solutions for incremental index update
• Creating a tool to manage search results on the website according to different criteria (dates, events, filters)

It was a long journey and tons of challenges, and I will be happy if some tips from this and my future blogs will save your time during planning or troubleshooting.

The Search functionality is an important feature on many websites related to content management (literally, it means almost all Sitecore-based websites). And in my experience, indexing/search logic was sometimes really complicated and required a deep understanding of what you could do with the available tools set.

What is the first step in all systems that requires Search?

The first and most important step is to collect as many search-related requirements as possible. Otherwise, it’s hard to design a schema and choose the Search engine if you don’t know how it will be used. To clarify versions, we started our project on Sitecore 9.2 because it was the latest one at that moment.

The customer wanted to use Azure Cognitive Search on production, and this was the first issue we faced, because (as we learned later) the project turned out to be complicated in terms of the search business logic. For some reasons, we couldn’t pull together all the requirements on time. So eventually, we selected Azure Cognitive Search for all shared environments (Dev, QA, Staging and Production) and SOLR for local environments.

It was a mistake for several reasons:

1. It took additional time to support several Search Engines.
2. As mentioned above, the search functionality caused performance bottlenecks (will be described later).
3. Some bugs were reproduced only on Azure Search or SOLR.
4. Different limitations from both system took time to deal with.
5. Local testing/development.
6. Sitecore SDK for both works differently when using Search.

As you can see, it was a pretty bad idea trying to mix it all. But we were brave enough to try it.

Azure Cognitive Search limitations

Here I will try to show all limitations that can affect your work during the project life.

1. An Azure Cognitive Search index can only contain up to 1000 fields. It means that all your fields + all fields that will be created (multi-language fields (1 field for every original field for one language), system fields) are limited by 1000. This is not much at all.
2. Joining queries such as .GroupJoin(), .SelfJoin(), and other operators that join queries, is not supported and results in an error. For our case, it was mandatory to have Group operations on the Search Server side. While the Azure Search was exploited on the website, the Search response could take up to 15 seconds(!!!) because group operations were performed on the Server side instead of the Search engine.
3. Some weird behavior for equaling string operations. It turned out that getting only equivalent results to the specific string is not supported on the Azure Search LINQ Query converter level. The reason is converting the .Equals() LINQ function into Azure search query.

Here, if the expression is string and the trimmed expression length isn’t equal to 0, this._queryBuilder.SearchQueryBuilder.Equal will be used. Let’s take a look what this method contains inside.

It contains typical Contains() function in the {fieldName}:(“{value}”) format.

You can invent something with different types (e.g., double, integer) as a workaround. This is the first signal that should make you consider the migration to the different Search Engine.

More limitations you can find here.

Azure Cognitive Search advantages

At the same time, Azure Cognitive Search has advantages too:

1. It’s powered by Azure, meaning that you can integrate search into different Azure apps.
2. It has 99.9% SLA, which is important for the production environment.
3. It’s easy to configure auto-scale.
4. It works pretty good for simple Search solutions.
5. Due to the fact that it’s a SaaS solution, it’s pretty easy to set up.

But these advantages could not outperform challenges that we faced, and finally, we switched from Azure Cognitive Search to SOLR, which made our solution easier to support and increased performance multiple times.

P.S.

In my following blog posts, I want to describe how we created the SOLR custom index, what issues we faced, and how we built the Full-Rebuild process. Stay tuned and try to avoid big challenges instead of fighting with them.

(If you prefer video content, please watch the concise video summary of this article below)

In July 2022, Sitecore officially entered the cloud era by announcing the launch of the Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud (XM Cloud) . With this new product, the company moved its main CMS solution to a cloud architecture, promising its customers exceptional digital experiences.

Let’s take a detailed look at Sitecore XM Cloud and discover the advantages that Sitecore clients and users will gain from new features offered by the platform.

Introduction

Sitecore is a leading global provider of solutions and tools for content creation and management, order and digital asset management, marketing campaigns, personalization etc. Sitecore Digital Experience Platform (DXP), powered by data science, analytics, digital marketing technologies, and AI/ML capabilities, allows eCommerce businesses to create advanced digital experiences across multiple channels and industries.

The important thing about Sitecore as a digital experience provider is that they never stop improving, and develop bleeding-edge solutions for their customers to make them succeed in their niche. Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud (XM Cloud) is among such game-changing products. Let’s answer some questions to understand the essence of this modern solution and compile its comprehensive definition.

Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud:

1. What is it? — An advanced CMS.
2. Where is it deployed? — In the cloud.
3. Who can use it? — Developers and marketing specialists.
4. What are the key characteristics? — SaaS, cloud nativeness, agility, the combination of traditional CMS and headless architecture.
5. What can you do with it? — create and manage content, start websites, deliver digital experiences across all channels from a single cloud platform.

Definition: Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) Cloud is a next-generation cloud-native Software-as-a-Service CMS that enables double-quick software development and cloud content management across multiple channels and devices due to its headless architecture.

Note that Sitecore Experience Manager offers a composable approach, which means you can flexibly use its modules. For example, initially, you decide to use the platform only as a CMS, because your budget is limited. But later, you need to add personalization or eCommerce functions. With Sitecore XM Cloud, you can quickly connect these modules like building blocks.

Features of Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud

To get a better understanding of the platform’s capabilities, take a look at the main features it provides.

Cloud Portal. This is a single control center for Sitecore XM products and solutions. Team members with the appropriate access rights can control all the products, perform operations with them and create composable experiences all in one place. In the future, Sitecore is planning to provide access to all the DXP products via Cloud Portal, which will be highly convenient.    

Sitecore Managed Cloud Deployment. Using the Experience Manager Cloud, you don’t need a DevOps engineer, because the deployment is configured automatically during the creation of a new instance in the Cloud Portal.

Headless Services. This is a module with software development kits and APIs for creating decoupled apps and delivering omnichannel experiences.

Headless SXA. Sitecore Experience Accelerator (SXA) is an add-on for Sitecore XM Cloud, allowing developers, designers, and content managers to work on your site simultaneously, thus speeding up development.

Sitecore Next.js SDK. This is a React-based framework with a set of sample applications enabling headless development.

GraphQL. An alternative to REST, GraphQL is the query language for APIs that ensures communication between the server and the client. With GraphQL, you can transfer the necessary data to the application in one request, even if they are located in several sources. This makes GraphQL data extraction technology more convenient and practical.

GitOps support. GitOps is a modern convenient approach in software engineering for cloud-native applications based on DevOps best practices. Sitecore Experience Manager supports GitOps, ensuring automation, transparency and improved team collaboration.

JAMstack support. This frontend architectural approach is based onJavaScript, APIs, and Markup and includes the static site generator (SSG) concept. JAMstack makes it possible to work with a variety of modern frameworks and offers exceptional flexibility due to the support of all deployment scenarios. When deploying a new environment, you can choose Vercel as a host provider that partners with Sitecore and provides SSG.

JSS. Sitecore XM supports the JSS framework, which provides JavaScript packages and allows for developing based on Sitecore data.

Multi-site management. With the new Sitecore product, marketers can translate and localize content easily, deploy Sitecore pages for multiple global regions much quicker, and manage them from a single place.

Pages. A product for visual content editing, which replaces Experience Editor. With Pages, you can manage all your media assets from a single place and distribute various types of content across different channels.

Content Explorer. A tool for editing content fields in the editor view. It allows you to work with content items of all websites within your instance, create new items, and even access content that is not available in Pages.

Components. It is also known as Frontend as a Service (FaaS), a reusable component editor, which allows you to select and manage data sources for components.

Benefits of Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud

Content management with Sitecore XM Cloud has a range of essential benefits for your business.

Fast website performance. The modern cloud architecture combined with the capabilities of headless CMS improve the loading speed of your website pages and the overall site performance calculated by search engines.>

Scalability. The SaaS and composable nature of Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud allows you to easily scale up and down your project depending on business requirements and other factors. You can add modules if your business is growing, or remove some unnecessary tools if you currently don’t use them.

Increased speed to market. Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud streamlines the development process due to flexible deployment scenarios, headless services, component reusability, GitOps support, and other modern tools and approaches. As a result, business owners can bring their products to market much faster.

Automatic updates. Since Experience Manager Cloud is a SaaS platform, all the updates are performed automatically, so you don’t need to constantly plan the updates and spend extra money on it.

Flexible pricing. Sitecore Experience Manager offers flexible payment options, since it uses a composable approach to digital experiences. You don’t pay for the entire system, only for modules you actually use for your business needs.

What Is the Key Difference between Managed Cloud and Experience Manager Cloud?

The main difference between Sitecore Managed Cloud and Sitecore Experience Manager lies in their cloud infrastructure delivery models. Managed Cloud is a PaaS (platform as a service) offering, while XM Cloud is a complete SaaS solution. There are also some other distinctive features:

• Sitecore XM is all about composability, which means it offers cloud headless and API-based solutions.
• Sitecore XM does not have CD environments, so the MVC renderings are no longer supported.
• Sitecore XM provides SPE and SXA modules out of the box.

What Can You Get Through Using Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud?

Experience Manager Cloud gives advantages to all groups of people who are in touch with it:

• Developers gain exceptional freedom in terms of software development. They can choose from a range of frameworks, DevOps tools, APIs, deployment options and third-party integrations.

• Marketers and content editors enjoy intuitive visual tools, the headless architecture and the WYSIWYG authoring experience. They can build amazing web pages and deliver content across multiple channels with no effort. Creating a digital content strategy has become easier than ever before.
• Customers get even more relevant content and personalized experiences.
• Business owners benefit from all the above-mentioned points: a streamlined development process brings the product quicker to the market; well-prepared marketing strategies achieve their goals; the number of loyal customers grows. It all results in additional revenues and profits for the business.

Conclusion

The Sitecore Experience Manager Cloud is a true next-generation CMS, offering you a wide range of capabilities for creating powerful SaaS products. With this agile, no compromise platform, you can easily improve your content experience and commerce management, rising it to the next level.